Labels

Black Lives Matter (143) Politics (117) white supremacy in politics (110) Black Entertainment (93) black history (85) Racism in politics (82) white supremacy (77) Black Feminists Rock (43) Black Women Rock (41) Black Women Matter (40) Racism (40) police brutality (38) Black Women (33) President Obama (32) white racism (32) Colorism (28) quotes (28) Rape Culture (25) Black Children (23) Black Herstory (23) Black History Being Made Now (23) Toxic Masculinity (19) All Black Lives Matter (18) Entertainment (18) black unarmed and dead (18) black lives matter victory (17) Sexism in Politics (16) victory (16) Comedy (15) African American Women (14) Anti-Racism Victory (13) Say Her Name (13) Black Feminists (12) Black Web Series (12) Police Murder (12) Police White Supremacy (11) Race (11) White Privilege (11) poetry (11) white supremacy in mainstream news (11) African American (10) Anti-racism (10) Protest Works (9) black dead and unarmed (8) black men (8) Black Artists (7) Black Men For Black Women (7) Light Skinned Privilege (7) Sexism (7) internalized racism (7) white entitlement (7) Barack and Michelle (6) Black Edutainment (6) Black Folks International (6) Environmental Racism (6) Stop Whitewashing History (6) white racial apology (6) Ackee & Saltfish (5) Art (5) Black Female Patriarchy (5) Cecile Emeke (5) Cultural Appropriation (5) Gun Control (5) Music (5) Patriarchy Matters (5) feminism (5) white fragility (5) Michelle Obama (4) People Of Color On The Rise (4) Supreme Court (4) hate crimes (4) religion (4) African American Men (3) CHEAP AND EASY HISTORY (3) Feminists Rock This World (3) History (3) Vote (3) Wisdom (3) internalized sexism (3) racism without racists (3) terrorism (3) white on white crime (3) American Masculinity (2) Obama Speech (2) Racism Abroad (2) Slave Master Mentality (2) War on Terror (2) poverty (2) white supremacy world wide (2) Black Children Rise (1) CINO (1) Products For Black Women (1) racial bias (1)

Saturday, November 14, 2015

SONYA SOTOMAYOR; SUPREME COURT ENDORSING A SHOOT FIRST, THINK LATER APPROACH FOR COPS


The Supreme Court set another killer cop free in Texas. But Sonya Sotomayor wrote a great dissent

Back Story: A cop named Mullinex asked if he could stop a car by shooting out the engine block while it was going 85 or 100 miles per hour (I dunno fast) without knowing if that would even work or if he could do it.

Supervisor said, "Stand by" and "Let's see if the spike strips work."


Mullinex shot at the car anyway and killed the driver


Mullinex said he was scared for the other officers safety or something. Cops are always scared when they put 4 bullets into somebody without a gun. I think the dead guy had offered some verbal threats. But the supervisor said wait. Later, Mullinex offered a flippant joke just after he killed somebody which is disturbing by itself


From Sotomayor's dissent

When Mullenix confronted his superior officer after the shooting, his first words were, “How’s that for proactive?” Ibid. (Mullenix was apparently referencing an earlier counseling session in which Byrd suggested that he was not enterprising enough. Ibid.)

The glib comment does not impact our legal analysis; an officer’s actual intentions are irrelevant to the Fourth Amendment’s “objectively reasonable” inquiry. See Graham v. Connor, 490 U. S. 386, 397 (1989). But the comment seems to me revealing of the culture this Court’s decision supports when it calls it reasonable—or even reasonably reasonable—to use deadly force for no discernible gain and over a supervisor’s express order to “stand by.”

By sanctioning a “shoot first, think later” approach to policing, the Court renders the protections of the Fourth Amendment hollow. For the reasons discussed, I would deny Mullenix’s petition for a writ of certiorari. I thus respectfully dissent. 


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sotomayor-supreme-court-cop-violence_563cee79e4b0307f2cad466a