Showing posts with label Black Entertainment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Black Entertainment. Show all posts

Friday, March 8, 2019

Ava DuVernay To Direct DC Comic's NEW GODS

     Ava DuVernay has lined up her directorial follow-up to Disney's A Wrinkle in Time.

     The filmmaker will take on Warner Bros. and DC's The New GodsThe Hollywood Reporter has confirmed. The property is a creation of the late and legendary comic book artist Jack Kirby, co-creator of Captain America, X-Men and other iconic heroes... 
     In the comics, The New Gods is part of the so-called “Fourth World Saga,” a series of four interconnected comic book series written and drawn by Kirby when he arrived at DC from rival Marvel in the early 1970s. Mixing social commentary, mythology and science fiction, it sees a war between two alien planets — New Genesis and Apokolips — arrive on Earth when the ruler of the dystopian Apokolips, Darkseid, discovers that humanity holds the key to the Anti-Life Equation, which allows its user to control all living beings in existence...

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/ava-duvernay-direct-dcs-new-gods-1094878

Monday, February 25, 2019

NO GOLDEN GLOBE FOR BLACK PANTHER AS WHITE RACIAL FANTASIES WIN AGAIN

a repost And as much as I was panting for BLACK PANTHER to win at the Golden Globes, I knew a superhero movie was a long shot --especially since the stars are all black folk. But GREEN BOOK winning instead?

Yet one more white redemption movie winning over the blackest movie I've seen in a while is just like the Hollywood White Elite choosing DRIVING MISS DAISY over DO THE RIGHT THING.
* * * * *

headline

How 'Driving Miss Daisy' Became One of the Most Scorned Best Picture Winners Ever

“When Driving Miss Motherf—-ing Daisy won Best Picture, that hurt,” director Spike Lee told New York Magazine in 2008. “[But] no one’s talking about Driving Miss Daisy now.” 

The filmmaker is hardly alone in his disdain for Bruce Beresford’s 1989 Oscar-winning adaptation of the Pulitzer Prize-winning play. And in fact, the few discussions that Daisy inspires nowadays often begin — or end — with a question: Was this the worst Best Picture selection ever made?
The choice caused controversy and skepticism even at the time, with the New York Times asking if the film had a “subtext that summons up a longing for the good old days before the civil rights movement.” And in the 25 years since it was released on Dec. 13, 1989, Daisy’s reputation has hardly improved. So how did the divisive little movie manage to win the most prestigious prize in cinema? And does it deserve the scorn it continues to attract today? 
...In fairness, it has its moments of complexity, most notably in the film’s best scene, as Hoke attacks his employer’s hypocrisy over not inviting him to attend a speech by Martin Luther King Jr. But on the whole, it’s a soft-focus, mostly unchallenging Stanley Kramer-esque take on...
race relations with a simplistic and rose-tinted view of the past...

I've said this about a number of movies and television shows. I'm going to say it again. If GREEN BOOK had come out in 1981, maybe this movie could be seen as a progressive race relations movie. But this came out in 2018. 

All GREEN BOOK reveals about our real world in the United States is how stuck white Americans are on re-shaping their racist past. That has to be what plucking the most rosy stories they can find about race relations are about.

It's not that all movies about race relations have to end in hopelessness. It's just that movies about white racists and regular black folk (not watered down, superstar-black folks like GREEN BOOK's Don Shirley) have to show racism being as ugly as it is. 

If you had blinked slowly three to four times during GREEN BOOK you'd miss the fact that Viggo Mortensen was playing a racist at all. And I think that's what white audiences loved about it.

I wound up watching this film with what seemed like all white senior citizens. The theater was packed too...in the late afternoon, when the gray hairs usually show up in force at the first matinee.  

That said, except for a few strongly cringy moments, it was entertaining --even to me. 
The whiten-folk of the gray hairs clapped at the screen when it was over, and did so for a long time -- which probably makes them representative of the same white people who voted for DRIVING MISS DAISY and DRIVING MR DON SHIRLEY (GREEN BOOK) for best picture.  

And you know what?

Now that I think about Mortensen's very peacefully racist role -- especially considering he was kind-of a hood rat in the movie-- I'm going to say I was wrong. This movie would not have worked as a progressive race movie even in 1981.

That said, except for a few strongly cringe-worthy moments, it was very light and entertaining.  And if I didn't know what a Green Book was and how it came to be a life saving tool for blacks in the south (it didn't just save black folks embarrassment and mean-talk from racists like it did in the movie) I wouldn't have been angry when I left the theater.

Yet I could have enjoyed the movie more 
if I both (a) didn't know what the Green Book was 
and had also (b) taken 3 or 4 long blinks, as described above. In this way, I'd have missed Viggo Mortensen being a racist altogether and everything would have been coming up disney for me too  -- just like it did for the white audience. 

And that's why this white redemption movie won the Golden Globe for Best Picture. 

But whiteness through rose colored glasses is never a good thing for white audiences. Never. And this is important, because it is white people who have a white supremacy problem to recover from -- and movies like GREEN BOOK drag white folks, as a group, backward instead of forward.

THIS BLOG IS MOVING 

find out where by checking out https://www.facebook.com/BCALR/?

Friday, February 8, 2019

A Salute To The Black Female Actresses Of 2018

feeling rebloggy

     In terms of quantity, this has been a strong year for Black female leads.


While it may not be reflected at year’s end when many critics groups and other organizations are hardly recognizing the works of many, with the exception of Regina Hall, but from the various festivals around the world to theatrical releases and streaming platforms, there were at least 30 or more films that featured Black actresses in lead roles in 2018.
     From studio thrillers to indie films, there were plenty of genres that were highlighted where the performances showcased the range of many.
     There is still a lot of work to be done. Oscar winner Viola Davis, after becoming the first African-American to win an Emmy for best actress in a drama in 2015, stated, “The only thing that separates women of color from anyone else is opportunity.”
     So far, in the Academy Awards’ 90 year history, Halle Berry (2001) is the ONLY Black woman to have won an Oscar for Best Actress out of the 11 Black women ever nominated. That’s 11 out of 450 in total. Hopefully, in time, some of these actresses will be starring in films that merit consideration and more than one.
     Among the 2018 highlights...

~BLACKFILM.COM
Read The List Here: https://www.blackfilm.com/read/2018/12/a-salute-to-the-black-female-leads-of-2018-films/ 


Saturday, January 19, 2019

Marsai Martin's LITTLE Is Coming To A Theater Near You

feeling rebloggy
     Marsai Martin, of BLACK-ISH fame, is a 14-year-old force to be reckoned with. And no, I don’t mean in the way that the 14-year-olds on the train home make you feel uneasy because you know they’re cooler than you. (Just me? Okay.) Well, I mean a certifiable force.


     Best known for her role as the too-wise-for-her-own-good Diane Johnson on BLACK-ISH, Marsai is now the youngest executive producer in Hollywood [History] after dreaming up the concept for and starring in the feature film LITTLE.
     Martin was literally 10 years old when she came up with the idea for the body swap comedy. Yes, you read that right. While you were on the playground playing “The Floor Is Lava” Marsai Martin was in a room with executives pitching LITTLE. In the words of producer Will Packer, “It’s crazy. I mean, what were we doing at 10 years old?”
...Marsai explained that it was a conversation with her parents that sparked the idea for the film. “Well, before the [pitch] happened we were talking–it was me, Mommy and Daddy–and we were talking about the movies they were watching back then, and one of my mom’s favorite movies growing up was Big. So, that’s really how the idea was just, like, brought out to us and I think that’s just where it all started! And then we just started brainstorming...
Read More Here: http://www.vh1.com/news/371812/little-marsai-martin-issa-rae-regina-hall-will-packer-film-black-girl-magic/

Preview:



Friday, January 18, 2019

MISTY COPELAND CONTINUES TO BRING BLACK HEAT TO THE VERY WHITE SPACE OF BALLET

feeling rebloggy 
     In 2015, Misty Copeland made history twice when she became the first African American woman to be promoted to principal dancer at the American Ballet Theatre (ABT), and along with Brooklyn Mack, the first Black couple to play the lead roles in a full-length production of "Swan Lake" at the Washington Ballet. 

     "Beyond my personal goals as a ballerina, I want to celebrate, elevate and give opportunities to talented Black and brown dancers to share the stage with me while I have the power and presence that I do," Copeland told the Los Angeles Times in an email. "And to build a structure which can continue to exist beyond me." 
...she and Calvin Royal III make their debuts as Pierrette and Pierrot in "Harlequinade"  at Segerstrom Hall [...marking] the first time in the company's history that an African American man and woman will dance a lead couple's roles. 
~BecauseOfThemWeCan 
Read More:  https://www.becauseofthemwecan.com/blogs/botwc-firsts/misty-copeland-and-calvin-royal-iii-will-be-the-first-black-couple-to-dance-lead-roles-for-the-american-ballet-theatre?

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

Coming Soon: BLACK EARTH RISING

NETFLIX



The limited series, created by Hugo Blick, takes place in the U.S., Africa and Europe and focuses on that follows the journey of Kate Ashby (Michaela Coel), a Rwandan orphaned by the genocide, raised in London by an adoptive mother and trying to discover the truth of her past. She is helped in her search by lawyer Michael Ennis (John Goodman). The series examines the West's relationship with Africa, set in a world of prosecution of war crimes."
~ShadowAndAct 
https://shadowandact.com/michaela-coel-is-on-a-journey-to-uncover-the-truth-in-new-trailer-for-netflix-thriller-black-earth-rising

Monday, January 7, 2019

NO GOLDEN GLOBE FOR BLACK PANTHER AS WHITE RACIAL FANTASIES WIN AGAIN

And as much as I was panting for BLACK PANTHER to win at the Golden Globes, I knew a superhero movie was a long shot --especially since the stars are all black folk. But GREEN BOOK winning instead?

Yet one more white redemption movie winning over the blackest movie I've seen in a while is just like the Hollywood White Elite choosing DRIVING MISS DAISY over DO THE RIGHT THING.
* * * * *

headline

How 'Driving Miss Daisy' Became One of the Most Scorned Best Picture Winners Ever

“When Driving Miss Motherf—-ing Daisy won Best Picture, that hurt,” director Spike Lee told New York Magazine in 2008. “[But] no one’s talking about Driving Miss Daisy now.” 

The filmmaker is hardly alone in his disdain for Bruce Beresford’s 1989 Oscar-winning adaptation of the Pulitzer Prize-winning play. And in fact, the few discussions that Daisy inspires nowadays often begin — or end — with a question: Was this the worst Best Picture selection ever made?
The choice caused controversy and skepticism even at the time, with the New York Times asking if the film had a “subtext that summons up a longing for the good old days before the civil rights movement.” And in the 25 years since it was released on Dec. 13, 1989, Daisy’s reputation has hardly improved. So how did the divisive little movie manage to win the most prestigious prize in cinema? And does it deserve the scorn it continues to attract today? 
...In fairness, it has its moments of complexity, most notably in the film’s best scene, as Hoke attacks his employer’s hypocrisy over not inviting him to attend a speech by Martin Luther King Jr. But on the whole, it’s a soft-focus, mostly unchallenging Stanley Kramer-esque take on...
race relations with a simplistic and rose-tinted view of the past...

I've said this about a number of movies and television shows. I'm going to say it again. If GREEN BOOK had come out in 1981, maybe this movie could be seen as a progressive race relations movie. But this came out in 2018. 

All GREEN BOOK reveals about our real world in the United States is how stuck white Americans are on re-shaping their racist past. That has to be what plucking the most rosy stories they can find about race relations are about.

It's not that all movies about race relations have to end in hopelessness. It's just that movies about white racists and regular black folk (not watered down, superstar-black folks like GREEN BOOK's Don Shirley) have to show racism being as ugly as it is. 

If you had blinked slowly three to four times during GREEN BOOK you'd miss the fact that Viggo Mortensen was playing a racist at all. And I think that's what white audiences loved about it.

I wound up watching this film with what seemed like all white senior citizens. The theater was packed too...in the late afternoon, when the gray hairs usually show up in force at the first matinee.  

That said, except for a few strongly cringy moments, it was entertaining --even to me. 
The whiten-folk of the gray hairs clapped at the screen when it was over, and did so for a long time -- which probably makes them representative of the same people who voted for DRIVING MISS DAISY and DRIVING MR DON SHIRLEY (GREEN BOOK) for best picture.  

And you know what?

Now that I think about Mortensen's very peacefully racist role -- especially considering he was kind-of a hood rat in the movie-- I'm going to say I was wrong. This movie would not have worked as a progressive race movie even in 1981.
That said, except for a few strongly cringe-worthy moments, it was very light and entertaining.  And if I didn't know what a Green Book was and how it came to be a life saving tool for blacks in the south (it didn't just save black folks embarrassment and mean-talk from racists like it did in the movie) I wouldn't have been angry when I left the theater. 

Yet I could have enjoyed the movie more 
if I both a) didn't know what the Green Book was 
and had also b) taken 3 or 4 long blinks, as described above. In this way, I'd have missed Viggo Mortensen being a racist altogether and everything would have been coming up disney for me too  -- just like it did for the white audience. 

And that's why this white redemption movie won the Golden Globe for Best Picture. 

But whiteness through rose colored glasses is never a good thing for white audiences. Never. And this is important, because it is white people who have a white supremacy problem to recover from -- and movies like GREEN BOOK drag white folks, as a group, backward instead of forward.

Wednesday, January 2, 2019

BLACK PANTHER WINS DOMESTIC BOX OFFICE RACE FOR 2018 AND PAVES THE WAY FOR MORE BLACK FILMS


For the record the AVENGERS movie only lasted at the box office for 20 weeks. BLACK PANTHERS's staying power was 25 weeks (based on theater's continued ability to sell tickets) shocking most every Hollywood white gatekeeper there is. 

In all fairness though, the AVENGERS flick was half a movie and ended on a down note. 

And while the AVENGERS more money altogether, making nearly 2/3rds of it's box office overseas, I have to wonder about how much of BLACK PANTHER'S limitations were due to white Hollywood assuming that black movies won't be watched in foreign markets.

I mean, even domestically, the AVENGERS was released in more theaters despite BLACK PANTHER (in hindsight) being the more successful movie. 


Assumptions going out of the gate determine where something is released and how many theaters it is released in, which in turn bolsters or limits the success of a movie. The mostly white Avengers -- all the core white characters still alive at the end of the first half of the Thanos episode-- opened in more theaters with way more hype, frankly. And it still didn't beat BLACK PANTHER domestically.

While there may be racist resistance to seeing black movies in some countries, based on home grown othering (racism) and white supremacy imported from the U.S. (people come to the U.S expecting all black people to be thugs based on exported white TV) black movies deserve more space, advertising and full court press overseas too.

BLACK PANTHER, 

a billion dollar block buster, 
has proven black movies 
with hella black female stars 
who are immediately identifiable as black-sans-question-marks
can go the distance.

And I'm hoping Jordan Peele's US is going to prove the same thing in Spring of 2019



Peele's GET OUT made 176 million dollars domestically, with only one black woman on the screen for a few minutes at a police station. With Lupita N'yongo and Anna Diop starring in US -- the black women cast as chocolate-y dark as the black men, same as BLACK PANTHER, I think black women movie goers might double this 176 mil. figure and maybe help the movie earn even more in foreign markets as well.

Black women support those who support us...in spades. So, I hope the black male gatekeepers of black film are paying attention too.

And wouldn't it be interesting to see if Peele, 

another black male Hollywood elite
married to a white or light woman, 
can pull other black male directors 
who also date/pair-up/marry nearly all light and white women 
into being just as pro-black for black women 
as they are for black men 
which might stop the black male Hollywood elite
from pouring colorism-based images over the black community 
"without noticing" that they are doing so.


A movie buff, I can't wait to see what happens next for black film. Can you?

I'm becoming more and more spoiled. After Shonda Rhimes created television shows with black female leads that didn't look bi-racial and/or some other race altogether, I started having a really hard time watching all white shows unless they were family dramas.

And now that I've had BLACK PANTHER, the bi-racial black chicks aren't enough for me -- not all by their lonesome. I love Tessa Thompson for example. But I'm only going to support her in a movie -- that I'm not particularly interested in seeing based on the storyline-- if I see another black woman sans white features in the film too.

Again, I supported damn near every single one of Halle Berry and Vanessa William's movies back in the day. Their white-featured version of good looks got them cast over and over again and they broke glass ceilings for black women in Hollywood. No doubt. But they mostly broke ceilings for other pale black women.

BLACK PANTHER, HIDDEN FIGURES, US, and VIOLA DAVIS movies are breaking adjacent glass ceilings for darker-skinned black women with black facial features.

And I'm here for all of it.



Tuesday, December 25, 2018

Jordan Peele's New Movie: US

feeling rebloggy

"After sending shockwaves across contemporary culture and setting a new standard for provocative, socially-conscious horror films with his directorial debut, Get Out, Academy Award®-winning visionary Jordan Peele returns with another original nightmare that he has written, directed and produced..."

read more at youtube link below

Us In Theaters March 15, 2019 https://www.UsMovie.com


Sunday, December 9, 2018

Wednesday, December 5, 2018

LENA WAITHE TELLS THE TRUTH AND SAMES THE DEVIL FOR BLACK WOMEN WRITERS


Feeling Rebloggy
Lena Waithe [Netflix "Master Of None" Writer] and a host of Black women writers in Hollywood gathered to discuss the work they do in supporting each other in an industry that's not built for their success. The numbers of Black women in television writing are so low you can't find statistics. In an op-ed article for The Guardian, Stefani Robinson (an Emmy-nominated writer for her work on "Atlanta"), lamented that only 4.8% of TV writers are Black.  The problem is systemic. She wrote:

Black showrunners are hiring black writers, sure. But what about white showrunners (the majority of showrunners)? Why aren’t they hiring minorities to write on their shows? I don’t know. Something that I hear a lot from white writers is that they like to “write what they know”. In my experience, this also means “I’m white so I only know and want to write white things. I don’t want to write about minorities because I won’t do them justice...
~FOR HARRIET 
https://theculture.forharriet.com/2018/12/lena-waithe-brings-together-black-women.html?

Tuesday, November 13, 2018

HOLD BACK THE STARS

Feeling Rebloggy


Individually, Letitia Wright and John Boyega have already traveled to futuristic worlds on the big screen.
Wright is the highlight of Black Mirror’s bleak fourth season, and the genius behind Wakanda’s cutting edge technology in Black Panther. Meanwhile Boyega played the rebellious Finn in the latest Star Wars flicks and an innovative fighter pilot in Pacific Rim Uprising.
But now these two young Hollywood legends-in-the-making are joining their talents and love of sci-fi into one futuristic love story titled Hold Back the Stars.
https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2018/11/john-boyega-letitia-wright-starring-sci-fi-romance-hold-back-the-stars 

BLACKCHICKROCKED.BLOGSPOT.COM

Tuesday, November 6, 2018

FIGURE SKATING MOMENTS: Vanessa James & Morgan Cipres


Vanessa James (born 27 September 1987) is a French pair skater. With her skating partner, Morgan Ciprès, she is the 2018 World bronze medalist, the 2017 European bronze medalist and a five-time French national champion. They have also won medals in Grand Prix and Challenger Series competitions.
With earlier partner Yannick Bonheur, James represented France at the 2010 Winter Olympics, placing 14th. She is also the 2006 British national champion in single skating.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanessa_James




Tuesday, October 30, 2018

The Best Part of Halloween? Stealing Candy From Your Kids and Using It to Extort Them

Feeling Rebloggy

Anyway, in a few hours, my 2-year-old daughter will circle the blocks around our neighborhood in search of candy and other assorted goodies. She will be dressed as a pumpkin. (She has also been instructed by me to spit at any adult who offers her candy corn.) Joining her will be my 12-year-old niece, (maybe) my wife, my cousin Huny, her kids, and perhaps some other straggler kid(s). I will be at home, distributing candy—Snickers, Reese’s cups and Skittles—and scaring white people with my “bearded Pittsburgh nigga on a stoop” costume. 
When my daughter gets back home, my wife and I will take her bags of candy—the bags she shuffled and sprinted and slaved up and down the block for—and. well, that will be that. She will, perhaps, get a piece or two today and tomorrow, but her candy consumption will be limited. I’d say maybe five percent of the candy she gets will actually go into her mouth. The rest will be ours. 
Maybe we’ll eat some of it. Maybe we’ll put some of it in tiny bowls when we host Thanksgiving next month or a game night in December. Maybe we’ll just use it as cruel parental totems for the next few months; extorting a week of good behavior in exchange for a miniature Twix bar. Either way, Halloween is nothing but a secret candy comeup for NWKs...
~VERY SMART BROTHAS / THE ROOT
https://verysmartbrothas.theroot.com/the-best-part-of-halloween-stealing-candy-from-your-ki-1830132878?

Thursday, October 18, 2018

TRUMP IN HELL



TRUMP IN HELL is reportedly the name of this re-created work.  The original was done by Andy Thomas and hangs in the White House.

BWAAAAAA HA HA HA

BLACKCHICKROCKED.BLOGSPOT.COM

Monday, October 15, 2018

Arguably The Most Important American Play Of The Decade: THE NICEITIES


As unlikely as it sounds, this two woman play is a hit even though it starts with a black female taking her academic paper to her white liberal professor for a quick review before she finalizes it.  

The black student's paper is on slavery's impact on the American Revolution. To be specific, the student hypothesizes that because the poorest, most financially and socially abused part of the population (blacks) were trapped inside slavery, they were not able to wage war on the upper classes as they did in other countries where much bloodier revolutions took place. 
The white liberal women, in her 60s, thinks the American Revolution was so much less bloody than other revolutions that took place around the world because white American democracy is just so...obviously good, just, and right. 
What I've old you here only describes the first 10 minutes, maybe less. 

The thing that amazed me about this play wasn't the black woman's arguments about how white male historians and their very limited perspectives have colored everything, including history in general; how Mike Brown will be recorded in history; or police brutality, but how often I could see, understand, and sometimes agree with the liberal white woman's points at certain sections of the play --so many times-- as heinously wrong she was about history; who gets tell it; and what it takes to create effective social change in the here and now. 

It was important to me that the liberal white woman not be a completely insensitive idiot, a back drop against which the black girl student looked like a genius. This play was two intelligent people --one of them beyond arrogant in a very recognizable way to most black people --doing verbal battle

I won't tell you anymore. 

I like going to see a play without knowing a single thing about it except the premise. But I had to tell you something, so you'd know why you should go see it. 

So, if you ever hear of this play coming anywhere near you...

GO!


And if this play doesn't wind up moving from Off-Broadway to Broadway, then white America really isn't ready to even begin talking honestly about race. Because we cannot have an intelligent conversation about white racism and white supremacy for so long as white liberals think these things are located in white men (and their white southern bell, non-thinking, no agency, go-along -to-get-along wives) who live in the south and maybe a couple out in places like Idaho, Iowa, and the Dakotas.

Some white liberals will be made uncomfortable and some will think they're already "cool" enough to already understand everything the black character said-- that's what I saw in the theater.

Trumpthuglicans will say, "SHE's the racist" -- that's also what I saw in the theater.

But black folks also need to go see it too. During the intermission, it became clear to me that I wasn't the only black person who hadn't really hadn't thought of how black slaves being present in this country took so much social-financial-class pressure off poor whites living here as opposed to poor people living in other countries -- the ones who eventually forced bloody revolutions forward.  


This play also made me think of how the white rich told the white poor their skin color gave them status, made them higher level human beings than blacks -- which pacified the white poor (before the middle class really existed)-- and in a way not seen as extensively in other countries. And this is still playing out in some of the same ways today.

White supremacy has been a tool wielded with cunning expertise by the white rich to get richer since this country was founded. This too is still playing out today.
And now that I think of it, white supremacy has been successfully used to pacify white people in much the same way many white liberals see religion being used to pacify people. 

If this play gets anywhere near you. Go see it. There are so many different race, glass, gender, and age topics covered in this play, you'll be discussing it for days afterward. 

And then you'll want to see it again because you know you missed a couple of things.




THE PLAYWRIGHT: ELEANOR BURGESS
In 2015, as Eleanor Burgess watched a firestorm erupt at Yale University, her alma mater, over an e-mail urging students to avoid wearing racially or ethnically offensive Halloween costumes, the Brookline-born playwright was struck by the dysfunctional nature of the conversations she was observing online. 
The e-mail had prompted a response from a Yale professor who worried about the consequences on free speech and argued that students should navigate these questions for themselves rather than ceding control to administrators. The debate exploded into a wider discussion about how students of color felt that Yale could sometimes be a hostile place for them. 

Burgess watched conversations among her own groups of friends — on social media and in e-mail and text message threads — devolve into acrimony and recrimination... 
The blow-up prompted Burgess to write THE NICEITIES   
The two-character drama, set in the spring of 2016, centers on a black student, Zoe (Jordan Boatman), and a 60-something white female history professor, Janine (Lisa Banes), who meet to discuss Zoe’s paper about the impact of slavery on the American Revolution. 
Their discussion quickly turns from the arguments and ideas contained in Zoe’s work into an explosive confrontation about broader cultural and historical concerns involving race in America, white privilege, and power imbalances on college campuses... 
Read More: https://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/2018/08/23/brookline-playwright-eleanor-burgess-the-niceties-peers-into-abyss-racial-division/QFZOFXbr9lEEvKD6wHByYL/story.html

BLACKCHICKROCKED.BLOGSPOT.COM

Saturday, October 6, 2018

THE LASTING SCARS LEFT BY THE ILLUSION OF INCLUSiON

If white supremacy is the pink elephant that goes unseen in too many rooms, colorism is its hippopotamus cousin—just as big, funky, and likely to be talked around rather than contained and removed from the premises. 

 Colorism, according to the Oxford Dictionaries, is “prejudice or discrimination against individuals with a dark skin tone, typically among people of the same ethnic or racial group.” 
On the surface, that’s technically correct. What’s missing are both the background context of institutional, systemic racism and White Supremacy that causes colorism, and the nuances of how it shows up in our lives. 
If you’re not White, chances are your life is impacted somehow by this dynamic. If you’re any part of a Multiracial family, it’s on your need-to-know ASAP list, especially if you haven’t experienced it directly or don’t quite understand how it works.
http://multiracialmedia.com/racism-meet-colorism-yara-alexandra-conversations-need-now/

 
While the technical correction above is correct, it isn't correct enough. 


The last part of the Oxford Dictionary definition is wrong about colorism being executed "typically among people of the same ethnic or racial group." 


The interracial version of Colorism has been executed first and most often by white people, always. 

In the days of slavery, if the master rapist of the house didn't sell his own children, born of his black female property, he kept his lighter skinned progeny working indoors. The "house slaves" and "field hands" were always separated by color, and that separation was originally done by white people.

Sometimes, the light-skinned slave was some other white person's child. But that person, as a child or an adult, looked close to white (human) to the white racist slave owner. Therefore, light-skinned people worked closer and inside the main house during slavery.  





Colorism has been executed first and most often by white people, always. 

To this day in the good ole USA, the observed value of a human being is still based on proximity to whiteness. And the people doing the valuing in places like Hollywood, and in an ordinary workplace near you, are most often white. 

At one of my first real jobs outside of retail, I watched a woman every bit as black as I am but very pale skinned get pats on the head for being beautiful just before she got promotions --when all she was is light-skinned with white-ish features

-- not smarter, 
-- not more industrious
-- not more deserving.

This wasn't her "fault" but she was in a privileged position all the same. 


The white woman we both worked for was one of the fairest I'd ever worked for. So maybe this light-skinned woman's start date being prior to mine was the main reason she was ahead of me at work. 

However, I watched how white people, especially white men responded to her paleness, commenting on her beauty. If that corporation had stayed in business, she'd have gone far without having do much more than be fairly competent -- same as most white women.

White people's preferences for people that look like them can most easily be seen in Hollywood. In television and movies, the first black characters that were not servants and maids and such, were often light-skinned --especially the black female characters.

Because beauty is still a measurement of a woman's worth and white women are still the standard bearers of beauty in white dominated American society, if not worldwide, men's attitudes have been disproportionally affected by colorism as opposed to other groups. 
In Hollywood, white men and black men both, will cast black men who are unambiguously black. But when black women actresses are sought they are looking for black women where the first question anyone asks upon seeing her is "What is she?"  


The photo most often available of Susan Kelechi
BEFORE
they put a braided wig on her head
AND
Cast her in THIS IS US

For black women interracial and intraracial colorism casting has resulted in numerous television shows and movies where there is truly an "illusion of inclusion" for black girls and black women.

Black male content creators have become notorious for making the pretty teenage daughter, the eldest, dating age daughter, a very pale what-is-she female. 

That is, if the pretty pale teenage daughter is seen outside the context of a black family drama or comedy, the first question anyone asks about her identity is "What is she?"


In THE COSBY SHOW that daughter was played by Lisa Bonet, until they added another pale mixed race woman to play Cosby's older, dating age daughter. She was supposedly away at college during the first season, played by Sabrina LeBeauf

In MY WIFE AND KIDS the pale dating age daughter was played by Jennifer Freeman



The eldest daughter in BLACKISH --a show which has done some perpetuating of colorism in the show itself  (remember the dark-skinned rough cousins from the hood come over for Halloween) is played by Yara Shahidi. 

Repeat female guest stars in BLACKISH include: Anna Devere Smith, Raven Symone, and Zendaya, all of whom are wonderful actresses and human beings as far as I can tell, but the most important feature they have for being hired is that they can pass plastic bag tests, much less a paper bag test.


Keep in mind, that even though the "Rainbow" character is supposed to be biracial, the actress that plays her IS biracial and her mother is Diana Ross -- not a woman as pale as Anna Devere Smith.
Rainbow's Fake Mom Anna Devere Smith
Tracee Ellis Ross' Real Mom: Diana Ross


ON A SIDE NOTE: I think it's perfectly shameful for a black show like BLACKISH to not acknowledge through its casting choices that mixed race people come in a variety of shades. It is shameful that a show with aspirations as low down as the ROSEANNE reboot had a dark-skinned little actress playing a mixed race child....because, just like in real life, it works out that way sometimes.

Like Lisa Bonet got her own show A DIFFERENT WORLD, Yara Shahidi also got a spin off show, GROWN-ISH, once her character graduated high school.


Because we, the black audience, didn't call out the colorism hard and loud in BLACKISH, content creator Kenya Barris went on to put Yara Shahidi in GROWNISH and subsequently multiplied the problem of colorism based casting. 


Look at that image: Once again the black men are unambiguously black while the center stage black girl fits into the WHAT-IS-SHE category -- a question that would always be asked until the young woman in question is starring in a "black show."

Some black women, mostly feminists I would guess, have been trying to drag colorism out in the open these days. I am too. But it's difficult. Black people are so ashamed of colorism issues that they try to do the same thing that liberal whites do with racism
  1. pretend it's not happening
  2. pretend it'll go away if you just stop talking about it
  3. pretend racism or colorism are just concepts that don't have real impact (White Folks' "There's only one race the human race" = "Oh MY GAWD! We're ALL black")
In the 1990s when A DIFFERENT WORLD came to television, Lisa Bonet's college spin off of THE COSBY SHOW, black people refused to talk about colorism at all. And some of us have paid dearly for that. 




The original cast of actors that played the center stage college students on A DIFFERENT WORLD, were all supposed to be black except one white girl played by Marisa Tomei -- who went on to make movies after the first season. The four other actresses in A DIFFERENT WORLD, with the exception of Charnele Brown who didn't have very many lines or a boyfriend each week, were all pale, mixed race. Lisa Bonet, Jasmine Guy, and Cree Summer would all fit into the category of WHAT IS SHE on any other show except a supposedly "black show."

Charnele Brown, the only black college
student on a black campus in
A DIFFERENT WORLD

In fact, you could say Charnele Brown was the only black girl student at a black college as far as A DIFFERENT WORLD goes.


So, I know Bill Cosby's A DIFFERENT WORLD perpetuated colorism in the black community. And I know that our inability to acknowledge the obvious colorism involved in the casting has hurt black girls every where too. 


But what I can't figure out is whether or not Bill Cosby's A DIFFERENT WORLD was telling us the truth. 

On A DIFFERENT WORLD, the black boys really weren't checking for Charnele Brown's character. Neither was the audience; she rarely had many lines. And in real life college, for a lot of medium and dark brown girls, we found black males weren't checking for us either. 
Black males have a nasty reputation, on black campuses and off, for looking light-skinned, 3C hair chicks like Lisa Bonet, Jennifer Freeman, Yara Shahidi, and Tisha Campbell  
so how can we be surprised that some of these black boys grow up to be black men who cast light-skinned black women that looked like the light-skinned black girls they were mostly chasing in college?
Even when black men cast light-skinned black women who have strongly black features, they have the light woman play the character that is good and funny and upright, while the dark-skinned woman gets treated a n-word.

And I am hoping that this is why MARTIN doesn't get much airplay anymore. 




When I was a child, I thought like a child.

So, I was happy watching most of these shows. I rarely winced or wished I was light-skinned like Lisa Bonet -- even though I could see how much more desirable she was to black males on the show and in real life. So many black males near me drooled over her.  


Yet I did NOT pray for her skin tone, same as I didn't want white skin.  


I like my skin. I always have. But I finally figured out that I wanted to be treated as precious. I realize now that my confused desires to be white and later light while not wanting my actual skin color to change --somehow-- were about how I was being treated. I didn't want to change myself. I wanted others to change toward me. I wanted black boys to change and like me as I am. 


In fact, I was being treated badly by black boys and black girls alike. 

Girls gravitate toward other girls that are being treated as if they are "pretty" too. Pretty is what being popular is all about for girls, from grade school all the way up through college.
I am a feminist. And I don't like it. But it's the truth.
Most black children, male or female, tend to gravitate toward or be extremely jealous of light-skinned girls in grade school. 

Light black girls are told they aren't really black, especially if they are actually biracial, and routinely told, "You think you're better than us!" by other legitimately jealous black girls. Even black parents can treat a light-skinned girl like she's a step above. But the jealousy and ostracizing can decrease OR become less important when a light-skinned girl gets to be dating age. 

That's when the black boys come calling on light-girls hot and heavy --whether they are actually "pretty" or not.

And black men, as a group, are not ashamed of this. Most are willfully unaware of how they perpetuate colorism in black female circles.

If black men were aware of their perpetuation of colorism among black women, Jay Z wouldn't have been able to put out a song about how he's rich enough to "get all the light-skinned honeys" then marry Beyonce without anybody commenting on this.    
If black men were aware of their perpetuation of colorism among black women, they'd have noticed that the only women that appear to have been worth listening to, worth leadership roles during THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT and THE BLACK POWER MOVEMENT were very pale black women. 
If black men were aware of their perpetuation of colorism among black women, black men would have noticed Bill Cosby chooses women to marry, women to cast, and women to rape based on their being white and also their proximity to whiteness.
The only thing I've found more amazing than black people failing to notice how colorism has pervaded every single thing choice that Bill Cosby has made when it comes to women -- his choice of wife, his choice of young female stars, his choice of rape victims-- is how black people failed to notice that Michael Jackson was severely mentally ill as a result of his bombardment by white supremacy in the music industry.

If we don't talk openly enough about colorism to notice it when it is obvious, how can we prepare and protect black children, especially black girls, from the secondary white supremacy called "colorism?"

I and thousands of other black girls that watched Cosby's shows probably shouldn't have gone off to college thinking Lisa Bonet, Jasmine Guy, or even Cree Summer were truly representative of us as black girls. 

And I sort of WAS aware that Lisa Bonet wasn't like me in any way. I was sort of very aware. But I squashed the knowledge, pushed it away in the name of "not being divisive." I wanted to feel like black people, especially black women are united, that we-are-all-one
My living on military bases, led to me missing the team-dark-skin versus team-light-skin thing in school. There were too few of us black girls to split up among color lines. When colorism issues came up --and it did come up-- we squashed individual beefs so fast we barely knew the subject had come up later the same afternoon.  
Maybe if I had gone to school where #team-light-skin and #team-dark-skin was a big thing, maybe I wouldn't have been quite so shocked by colorism from black boys on campus in my college years. Maybe I'd have been better off not so ignorant. I might not have been so hurt.
If the black community was more open to talking about colorism in general, I probably would have gone off to college worried, but at least MORE aware that I was going to be ignored, much like Charnele Brown's character on A DIFFERENT WORLD was in her fictional world. 

However, I can say college brought a little maturity to my peers. At least I was no longer attacked and given the n-word treatment by black boys, much like Tichina Arnold's character in MARTIN. That kind of treatment was ongoing from grade school through junior high but it stopped in high school.


But by then, I thought I was ugly because I was treated as if I was ugly by black people and white people alike, starting when I was approximately six years old. 


It's hard to believe I couldn't see past that for years. 
I had a couple of severely awkward years between 12 and 14, but I can't believe how blessed I mostly happened to be in the looks department. My mother is a pretty woman, and though I am darker skinned, and I look a lot like her. 

Yet, I couldn't see anything desirable or lovely about myself for the longest time. Now, I look at old pictures and wonder what kind of emotionally damaged mind I must have had to see someone so ugly in the mirror.
By the time I realized I was not particularly hideous, I really didn't know how to flirt very well. The men attracted to me seemed to be those that sensed that I was weak or socially off balance. In other words, I tended to attract narcissists looking for an audience of one. Lucky for me, they tend to be boring so I saw them off pretty quickly.
But other medium to dark black girls haven't been so lucky. 

All of this is why I find it kind of amazing that most of the black community seems unaware that colorism's heart lies with black men. I found it perplexing that Bill Duke's DARK GIRLS then LIGHT GIRLS didn't address black men's attitudes toward skin color given how obvious it is in Hollywood.

Same as I think straight hair and weaves on women are only problematic when they are being worn by upwards of 90% of black women because, as a group, we feel nothing else is attractive, professional or adult (as we tended to prior to the natural hair movement) I think interracial relationships are only problematic when upwards of 75% of high profile black men are dating white and light women because they feel nothing else is attractive.

Black male affinity for white beauty aesthetic is the invisible pink hippopotamus in the black community's collective living room. And it's had tremendous impact on all of us. The recent exception to this rule, should have made this rather obvious.



I don't think it's a coincidence that Ryan Coogler married a black woman that is immediately identifiable as black then directed BLACK PANTHER as if he finds black women who look black valuable.  


How many dark-skinned black actresses have had their careers enhanced by Spike Lee or lately Jordan Peele?  


As many movies and projects that Spike Lee has done, you can count the number of black looking black actresses he's helped on one hand and most of attempts to help those women have only been done in the last 5 years after 20 years of bupkis for any dark woman except his sister. 


This matters.

Black boys are learning how to treat black women from more than just their parents. They are learning from their television, movies, and peers -- peers who are also learning about what's valuable in a black woman from television and movies.

BLACK PANTHER should not have been exceptional in it's valuing of dark-skinned women. If the first film directed by a black director, THE HOMESTEADER, was directed in 1919 by Oscar Micheaux --and even THAT story was a black man in love with an almost white girl -- then then 2018 shouldn't have been the first year I saw a black film where it's the light-skinned woman who barely has any lines and gets killed off early.

Our fiction is created by real people who bring their real values to black images. And way too many of the black men who are 90% in charge of black productions are colorstruck.


We have to clean our community and the images we are being bombarded with at the same time. The illusion of inclusion cannot stand. A dark-skinned mixed race woman can play a black woman in anything, in my opinion. But I'm tired of mixed-race looking women --whether they ARE mixed race or not-- standing in for black women 90% of the time instead of something more like 15% of the time.


Some black girls that look black have been treated so badly by black boys so early in life, that they've thrown the baby out with the bath water. 
They don't want anything to do with black men at all. (And that's the problem with children dating and having sex at 13 and 14. They get their feelings hurt too deeply, too early then make sweeping, permanent, childish decisions)
Some black girls like me, after years of denying colorism is as prevalent as it is, retreat from romance for years at a time. (Black men not being feminist minded had been the biggest problem for me, honestly)

Other black girls settle for someone who wants a maid or a mommy, just so they aren't alone


Still other black girls avoid men altogether and have babies so they won't be alone.


Some stay with troubled men that are abusive, thinking they can save them

And some black girls commit suicide.

None of these things I've listed are qualified or quantified. The black women who care, a small percentage of dark and light women that care about colorism,  only know about these outcomes through anecdotal evidence. It is way past time for a sociological study of colorism that includes 1) when and where black men stopped judging one another through the lens of colorism --if they did; when white people stopped judging black men through the lens of colorism; and how black, mostly male, content creators in Hollywood have been perpetuating colorism.

It's time

BLACKCHICKROCKED.BLOGSPOT.COM

updated 10/10/18

UNACKNOWLEDGED COLORISM MIGHT BE MORE DESTRUCTIVE INSIDE THE BLACK COMMUNITY THAN IT'S KISSING COUSIN UNACKNOWLEDGED RACISM