Showing posts with label Sexual Blackmail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sexual Blackmail. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 23, 2018

LEE DANIELS IS ACTUALLY PLANNING A #MeToo COMEDY

Feeling Rebloggy

“That’s exactly why it’s important to get in the writers’ rooms now and to connect with Hollywood now,” she explained to the New York Times. “Before it gets to be such a catchall phrase that they dilute its meaning, that we help people understand the gravity behind the words and that it’s not just used as, ‘Oh, look who got Me Too’d, ha-ha,’ like a punch line.”
“I just read something the other day that said Lee Daniels is making a Me Too comedy. The hair stood up on my arm. To put Me Too and comedy in the same sentence is so deeply offensive and not because I’m uptight and I don’t see comedy in things. We’re not ready for a comedy and it’s just so offensive that you think in this moment when we’re still unpacking the issue that you can write a comedy about it. And that’s the type of thing I’m talking about. We have to get out in front of that,” said Burke.
~THE GRIO 


Tuesday, September 25, 2018

RIGHT NOW THERE ARE DOZENS OF OLD RICH WHITE MEN THINKING...

Why the hell didn't we just throw Woody Allen's ass in prison when his Ronan Farrow's sister Dylan accused Allen of being a pedophile?

'Cause Ronan wouldn't be all up in their sh*t right now if they had. 



In case you don't know Farrow's backstory: 

Ronan Farrow proud of sister Dylan who accused their dad Woody Allen of molestation


http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/ronan-farrow-proud-big-sister-dylan-article-1.3932465# 

His sister Dylan being ignored then being called a liar after what she suffered has majorly shaped who Ronan Farrow is.  


Farrow got the #MeToo ball rolling downhill fast by taking out Harvey Weinstein. And now, in addition to other stories he's written, Farrow has interviewed the second woman to accuse Brett Kavanaugh of predatory sexual behavior.  

Read It Here: https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez


I'm also thinking Farrow must be needing a bodyguard right about now. He's taken down quite a few have-the-world-by-the-ass white millionaires at this point.

BLACKCHICKROCKED.BLOGSPOT.COM

Monday, September 10, 2018

LES MOONVES OUT AT CBS AFTER SECOND SET OF SEXUAL ASSAULT AND HARASSMENT CHARGES


According an to Ronan Farrow interview on ABC, the article writer, CBS knew about forced oral sex as early as January 2018. CBS was resistant to firing a man responsible for billions of dollars worth of revenue. 


But now more women have come forward. 

By the way, Les Moonves tried to destroy Janet Jackson's career over that famous wardrobe malfunction that happened on stage during a Super Bowl with Justin Timberlake years ago.  Think about the level of hypocrisy that takes.




FROM THE NEW YORKER
RONAN FARROW
One of the women with allegations against Moonves, a veteran television executive named Phyllis Golden-Gottlieb, told me that she filed a criminal complaint late last year with the Los Angeles Police Department, accusing Moonves of physically restraining her and forcing her to perform oral sex on him, and of exposing himself to her and violently throwing her against a wall in later incidents. The two worked together in the late nineteen-eighties. Law-enforcement sources told me that they found Golden-Gottlieb’s allegations credible and consistent but prosecutors declined to pursue charges because the statutes of limitations for the crimes had expired. Early this year, Moonves informed a portion of the CBS board about the criminal investigation...
Three hours after the publication of this story, CNN reported that Moonves would step down from his position at CBS. Later the same day, CBS announced that Moonves had left the company and would not receive any of his exit compensation, pending the results of the independent investigation into the allegations. The company named six new members of its board of directors and said it would donate $20 million to organizations that support the #MeToo movement and workplace equality for women. The donation will be deducted from any severance payments that may be due to Moonves...

Read More: https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/as-leslie-moonves-negotiates-his-exit-from-cbs-women-raise-new-assault-and-harassment-claims 

CBS is reportedly holding back Moonves' 100 million dollar golden parachute pending investigation
BLACKCHICKROCKEDROCKED.BLOGSPOT.COM

 

Wednesday, February 7, 2018

POINTING #MeToo AT LASTING LEGAL CHANGE

continued from THE DERAILING OF #MeTOO
What I'm worried about now is that some of the men too quickly fired didn't do THAT much OR they will be able to claim they didn't do much, were victims of a #MeToo Witch Hunt (ala DayGlo Orange Dunderhead) then go on as they were before


...once the fervor dies down over #MeToo


To me, another central problem lies in the fact that even as feminist rightfully protest sexual harassment, sexual blackmail, and sexual assault, they are taking advantage of patriarchy at the same time


...by portraying women as completely helpless.



White women, who seem to be socialized in a way that's very opposite to black women's *strong black woman* stereotype(?)  seem to be leaning into a still legitimately shifting definition of "consent" that infantilizes women. And that's not that surprising because their definition of consent sort of matches white women's infantile socialization as women.


To me this means white women claiming to want to "take back their power" are going to have to be able to say and/or do things that mean "no" when their life and/or livelihood is NOT at risk.

This doesn't mean men can continue to go to court and lie saying, "I never heard the word "no" " But it does mean that Aziz Ansari's date had the obligation to say "no" clearly and leave his presence. Her description of moving all over the room, instead of leaving and tell him to slow down instead of saying "no" told me she wanted him to treat her like a woman he wanted to get to know instead of f*** buddy or a sex worker. 

I wouldn't let my 22 year daughter date him if I had a say, because he's more than a bit of a pig. But grown women should know how to deal with pigs. Children shouldn't date because both pigs and straight up predators are both out there waiting on strong and weak women alike. 


The other effect of infantilized white womanhood has had on #MeToo is to suck things into the movement that don't belong there.


The predominantly white press, so anxious to make the Larry Nassar story a feel good story of women's triumph, has either entirely missed the fact that a child had to wait until she grew to adulthood to go to the police herself about Larry Nassar...or they are glossing it over.  And that's an important fact to not discuss because: 
  • Over a period of more than 20 years worth sexual assault against girls as young as eight, coaches didn't report Larry Nassar to the police
  • Over a period of more than 20 years worth sexual assault against girls as young as eight, USA Gymnastics didn't report Nassar to the police.  
  • Over a period of more than 20 years worth sexual assault against girls as young as eight, the University Of Michigan didn't report Larry Nassar to the police.  
  • Over a period of more than 20 years worth sexual assault against girls as young as eight, parents didn't report Larry Nassar to the police either.  
And after hearing former gymnast Mattie Larson speak on how she had to injure herself so she would not have to go back to the Olympic training camp where Nassar was and also  listening to mothers say they were in the room while Nassar was abusing their daughters, I came to realize that these little girls would have been victims of child abuse even if Larry Nassar had never been born.  
Apparently, olympic training is the land of "no pain/ no gain" and at least  40 hours of training per work week in order to create a the child professional athlete .  
This level of body work (and life long body damage) means a child getting used to pain and parents getting used to seeing their girls crying, parents used to hearing them beg to come home --just as former gymnast Mattie Larson described.  
 Parents had to have been used to seeing pain in their daughter's faces, right?  I can't think of any other way a mother can be in a room with a man while he is sexually assaulting her daughter and not know it or figure out that something terrible happened the minute she gets up off the examination table. But who knows?
The thing I do know is this:  We'd be having a public discussion about just how Larry Nassar likely hid his sexual abuse behind child abuse and the ignoring of child labor laws if the mainstream media recognized that the abuse of children and the abuse of grown women are not the same. 

What happened to those girls, for over 20 years, wasn't based on just one or even two things. Predators will always be with us. But if one predator preys on 100s of girls over decades something is wrong with us. And another Larry Nassar is in our future if we don't figure this out. 


So we have to ask detailed questions about who was paying or not paying attention to what, when, and where--- no matter who's feelings are offended. The parents of these Olympic gymnasts may have been "groomed too" as the judge said. But that doesn't make the parents co-victims with the sexually assaulted girls.



LARRY NASSAR IS THE SECOND COMING OF JERRY SANDUSKY AND MORE WILL FOLLOW



But I understand the press' confusion on how to handle Olympic gymnasts now women. A few too many white women narratives on predators like Weinstein are coming across like 'I was a little girl when I was attacked but now I'm a woman and fighting back.'

The grown women of #MeToo shouldn't be sounding anything like a sexually assaulted child -- whether we're talking about Nassar's little girl victims and Sandusky's little boy victims.



ADULT BEHAVIOR 1 
In contrast, a white actress named Uma Thurman is the latest actress to come forward and say Harvey Weinstein "attacked" her. A powerful actress at the time and behaving like a grown woman, she confronted him. Then she logically got some protection, male and more Hollywood-powerful, in the form of Director Quentin Tarantino who also confronted Weinstein. 
Weinstein appears to have been forced to apologize (instead of go to jail like I'd like to see in the future). Then Thurman went on working for and near Weinstein because she didn't want the attack affect her career.    
Like Lupita Nyong'o and Salma Hayek, she told enough detail about what he did and what she did in response and has therefore given us an example of the blackmailer to blackmail-ee relaionship

ADULT BEHAVIOR 2  
A white actress named Angelina Jolie --rich before she ever took one acting role being the daughter of Jon Voight-- said Harvey Weinstein did something to her that she didn't like so she never worked for him again.
As far as I know that's the beginning, middle, and end of her story so far.  And that's fine for so long as she does not try to be a spokesman for #MeToo, 
NON-ADULT BEHAVIOR 
If Rose McGowan wants to be out in front of #MeToo then she's going to have to take responsibility for the choices she made before, during, and after the assault-- same as Lupita, Uma, Salma. She can't hint and allude then cuss people out for asking her for relevant details. 
And if Weinstein's rape has left her a little unbalanced -- as I would me-- she needs to go sit down somewhere. 
The other thing that an infantilized white womanhood like McGowan's appears to be doing is keeping the focus on women's outrage at not being treated with the basics of respect, which then sometimes coming off as being outraged at not being protected.

--which kinda seems like white feminists leaning into the benefits of patriarchy


Beyond looking bad and being bad, this is important because men who are the ones mostly in control in government and corporations are using #MeToo female outrage to make "misbehaving men" disappear too quickly.

The real goal of male gatekeepers in congress and corporations is to save face and keep a brand from being tarnished.  But the withholding of information on what a exactly man did sometimes makes it appear that high profile men are being fired for nothing

...especially in the eyes of those who want to go back to the good ole days of  'oh big deal, he grabbed her breast.'


All of this taken together tells me that we all have some adjustments to make.


Same as black women have to accept that strong-black-woman is a myth that must die, white women need to kill of helpless-child-woman who's all grown up now and expects to be taken seriously.


Men who are watching #MeToo

get a little out of hand
due to white women/feminists leaning into patriarchy
via an unacknowledged belief in helpless-child-woman
and are therefore creating
coinciding definitions of "consent" that don't take
adulthood into consideration
should not be feeling sorry for themselves.

Men still have most of the social power in this country. That hasn't changed and it'll take years before we, women, can separate the wheat from the chaff and put a lot of the chaff in prison. Think about it: A large swath of white people, scared that whiteness wasn't going to rule anymore, voted Agent Evil Orange into the presidency as soon as when Obama's eight years were done.

And most of us can see how well that's going so far. I was thinking A.E. Orange was going to start a nuclear war with North Korea before I get to see Chadwick Boseman play THE BLACK PANTHER later this month.


So, I'm not going to go for a blind #BelieveWomen but I'm not crying for men either. Male privilege is real.  Let me say it again: We're all going to have to make some adjustments.



Anybody who is not going to step up and do some thinking and do some hard mental work so we can make the needed changes should go sit down somewhere and let the adults work things out.


BLACKCHICKROCKED.BLOGSPOT.COM

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

ON THE DERAILING OF #MeToo



Some men need to go to prison for what I call "sexual blackmail." And some of the people, men and women, who help them cover the blackmail and assaults need to be at risk for going to jail as accessories. 

In order to understand what I mean by "sexual blackmail" let's look at regular blackmail

When woman A uses the fact 
that she's seen woman B steal money 
from ABC Corporation to extort money, 
both the blackmailer and the blackmail-ee are criminals. 

However,

if man A takes pictures of man B's teenage son 

while that son was engaged in  a legal but embarrassing act 
and man B extorts money from man A
saying he'll delete/destroy the photos in exchange for a lot of money
and man A complies by paying the money,
both the blackmailer and the blackmail-ee
are engaged in the criminal enterprise that is blackmail, 
but most of us see the blackmailer as the criminal
while the blackmail-ee is an innocent victim

And this is how we need to see some women who were attacked by men like Harvey Weinstein and continued to work with him.


continued from STRONG BLACK WOMAN, INFANTILIZED WHITE WOMEN, AND AZIZ ANSARI


The way I read the law now, as a layman, people can go to jail for extorting money or services.  However, an attempt to force a woman into a sex act by threatening her with the loss of her job or ability to work, should also be seen a form of blackmail...because that's exactly what it is. 

A REAL LIFE EXAMPLE OF "SEXUAL BLACKMAIL:" 
HARVEY WEINSTEIN AND SALMA HAYEK
When Weinstein agreed to do a historical project close to her heart, on Frida Kahlo, Weinstein turned up the sexual heat on Hayek. She writes, 
"Little did I know it would become my turn to say no.
  • No to opening the door to him at all hours of the night, hotel after hotel, location after location, where he would show up unexpectedly, including one location where I was doing a movie he wasn’t even involved with.
  • No to me taking a shower with him.
  • No to letting him watch me take a shower.
  • No to letting him give me a massage.
  • No to letting a naked friend of his give me a massage.
  • No to letting him give me oral sex.
  • No to my getting naked with another woman.
  • No, no, no, no, no …
  • And with every refusal came Harvey’s Machiavellian rage."
But then, as her producer, he was able to demand a non-existant sex scene between her and another woman be inserted into the movie FRIDA. Weinstein "had his way with her" anyway. 
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/13/opinion/contributors/salma-hayek-harvey-weinstein.html

#MeToo and #TimesUp needs to move on to changing laws and putting people in prison. This is not just about embarrassing men until they have to resign....and go get a job elsewhere once the heat is off.

Before the #MeToo movement can move on to changing laws and adding onto existing laws, we need to create better definitions and definitions of levels for sexual harassment and sexual assault.


And in order for definitions to be created, we need to do a detailed examination of what is already happening in this moment when American woman have the world stage through Tarana Burke's  #MeToo movement. We need to examine what we seek to define. 

That means the details of what the predator did as well as the victim's detailed response needs to be known if the victim is an adult. #BelieveWomen, end of story, is not enough to take the actions we need to take against some of these predators. I'm sorry.

I'm sorry it's humiliating to tell the details of sexual assault and sexual harassment. But Salma Hayek and Lupita Nyong'o and dozens of other women in Hollywood told the whole truth about their assaults, their near assaults, and the coerced-cooperation that followed after Harvey Weinstein victimized them.

Believe Women + End of Story = Not enough.


Rose McGowan, for example, probably has a story similar to other women in Hollywood. But sometimes she appears to be trying to hide her coerced-cooperation with Weinstein behind something that, in one interview, sounded like 

"I practically fainted while wide awake...and all of sudden I was naked."
In separate interviews she says her career was affected by him. But when she described the attack itself, at least in one interview, she got defensive about basic questions and went into the...it just happened routine -->Believe me. It happened. End of story.

This is not enough testimony for someone who wants to be a leader of #MeToo.

The only way we know 99.9% know McGowan was raped because of all the other women that testified in detail as to what Weinstein did -- humiliation or no humiliation. They were also willing to say what they did and didn't do in response to being attacked and also  what they were thinking at the time 


And I'm sorry. But this is what is required if we're going to move forward because "believe me" because women are offended right now and women have the world stage right now is NOT enough to create lasting change.

None of this means I've forgotten that men have lied and lied and lied some more about the reason they raped women (reportedly, only 2 to 4% of women like about rape when they report it to police - estimate vary) 
Men have said things that mean 'I was drunk which made me all but insane' OR 'she was drunk which made her nearly insane. And we'll never know what happened so you can't even charge me with anything.'
The men who don't DO the raping and sexual assaulting have become part of this  by offering up reasonable doubt beyond reasonable belief.  That is, the mostly male justice system cosigns the men confused about consent/drunk insanity nonsense. And the jury, the lawyers, the judges, all have the same attitudes that the general population does.

So, I'm not crying for men that feel unjustly accused at this point. Look for tears elsewhere. 

The pendulum is swinging. And I'm not so sure the swing has gone so far to the other extreme yet. But the pendelum has been doing some serious hang time on men's side for a long time. So, I know it will swing back. 

Men didn't lose most of the social power they hang onto in this country behind #MeToo any more than white people lost a bunch of social power based on whiteness just because a black man got to be president

But when the gender pendulum swings back 
will it settle somewhere in the middle
where we can stop using vague ass terminology like 
"sexual misconduct" which means 
"men behaving like dirty, bad little boys" 
and identify more instances of "sexual assault" 
at a variety of levels 
(no charges / misdemeanor charges/  and felony charges) 
then legally define "sexual blackmail" 
followed by actually putting men in jail?

to be continued

BLACKCHICKROCKED.BLOGSPOT.COM